5 Conditions Imposed On Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal As Supreme Court Grants Him Bail In Liquor Policy Case
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan granted bail to Kejriwal saying prolonged incarceration amounts to unjust deprivation of liberty.
In a massive boost to the Aam Aadmi Party ahead of the state Assembly elections, the Supreme Court on Friday granted bail to its national convener and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a corruption case registered by the CBI in the alleged excise policy scam.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan granted bail to Kejriwal saying prolonged incarceration amounts to unjust deprivation of liberty.
It also put in place 5 conditions for Kejriwal to follow, including those set in earlier when he got relief in the ED case:
These new conditions include:
- The apex court granted bail to Kejriwal, subject to bail bonds of Rs10 lakh.
- The Delhi CM cannot comment on the ongoing Delhi liquor policy case.
- Kejriwal will have to be present for trial unless exempted by the courts.
- He cannot sign official documents.
- Kejriwal can't enter the Chief Minister's office or the Delhi secretariat while out on bail.
Justice Bhuyan, during the hearing, questioned the CBI for arresting Kejriwal, saying that such action by CBI raises serious questions on the timing of the arrest and such an arrest by CBI only fractured the bail granted in the ED case.
Keeping Kejriwal incarcerated would be travesty of justice: SC
He said keeping Kejriwal incarcerated when he is on bail in the ED case would be a travesty of justice. He further said Kejriwal was granted bail in the ED case and further detention in the CBI case is wholly untenable.
Justice Bhuyan also said that bail is the rule and jail is an exception. "The process of trial or steps leading to arrest should not become harassment," said the judge.
CBI arrest is "unjustified", says court
CBI arrest is "unjustified" and thus Kejriwal should be released forthwith, said Justice Bhuyan.
Earlier, the apex court had reserved the verdict on September 5 after hearing counsels representing Kejriwal and CBI.
During the hearing of the case, Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, appearing for CBI, objected to Kejriwal for not approaching the trial court for bail.
Kejriwal had directly approached the Delhi High Court for bail and then moved to the apex court. On August 5, the Delhi High Court upheld the arrest of the Chief Minister as "legal." It had dismissed Kejriwal's plea challenging his arrest, saying it was only after sufficient evidence was collected and sanction was obtained in April 2024 that the CBI proceeded with further probe against him.
The High Court had said there was no malice in the acts of the CBI, which demonstrated how Kejriwal could influence witnesses who could muster the courage to depose only after his arrest. It had said Kejriwal is not an ordinary citizen but a distinguished recipient of the Magsaysay Award and the convenor of the Aam Aadmi Party.
ALSO READ
"The control and the influence which he has on the witnesses is prima facie borne out from the fact that these witnesses could muster the courage to be a witness only after the arrest of the petitioner, as highlighted by the special prosecutor," it had said in its order.
Kejriwal was arrested by the ED on March 21, 2024, in connection with a money laundering probe relating to alleged irregularities in the now-cancelled Delhi excise policy 2021-22. On June 26, 2024, AAP Chief Arvind Kejriwal was arrested by CBI while he was in custody of the Enforcement Directorate in the excise case.
RECENT STORIES
-
RRB ALP 2024: Admit Card Released; Check Exam Pattern -
AI-Powered Smart Glasses That Can Identify Faces & Provide Navigation Support For The Visually... -
Nayanthara - Beyond the Fairytale Review: Film Shies Away From Controversies, Paints A Disney-esque... -
Ford Shares Declines As The American Giant Says It Will Cut 4000 Jobs Amid Weak EV Sales -
Bengaluru Weather: City To Experience Cool Temperature, Foggy & Cloudy Skies For Weekend